Doing the Rounds – Volume 2

 

AVN Fund-Raising effort – help us to get to $52,000!

Our first project with these funds:

Sydney Vaccination Seminar – 99% confirmed!

AVN Membership Drive

Wakefield made a scapegoat yet again!

So what did happen after Wakefield’s article was published?

Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism

More on the QCCL

 

AVN Fund-Raising effort – help us to get to $52,000!

Return to top

Quite a few of our members suggested a fortnightly tally sheet and several also asked for a chart so you can keep track of how the fund-raising drive is going. Now, I did this myself and remembering that I am a maths-a-phobic (remember the $26-$260 blooper?), I hope I did this right?

 

To date, we have received $6,016 in donations – going towards our goal of $52,000. This is a fantastic start! Please remember that all it will take is $26 from each one of you to help us achieve our goals – as stated in the last edition of this newsletter. If you have not yet given, please have a think and if it is possible for you to do so, your donation would be very much appreciated.

 

The other thing people have asked is how they can make donations so…this information will be repeated in each edition of Doing the Rounds:

 

We accept donations by credit card by phone (02 6687 1699), FAX (02 6687 2032) or on our website – www.avn.org.au. Just click on the link that says Donate in the upper right hand corner or use the Paypal link which is just below the magazine cover.

 

You can also direct deposit funds into our account at the Westpac bank either by internet banking or over the counter. Please! Leave your name as identification so we can send you a receipt. There are several unidentified donations which have come in recently. If you deposited money more than a week ago and have not yet gotten a receipt, please contact us and we will hopefully be able to work out which payment is yours.

 

The bank details are as follows:

 

Australian Vaccination Network Inc.
Westpac Bank - Ballina Branch
BSB number is 032 591
Account number is 188207

Of course, cheque or money orders can be posted to:

AVN

PO Box 177

Bangalow NSW 2479

AUSTRALIA

 

If anyone reading this did not receive last edition and therefore, doesn’t know what we are raising money for, please email me at meryl@avn.org.au and I will be happy to send you through the information by return email.

 

Our first project with these funds:

Return to top

I have arranged with an independent laboratory to test two different vaccines for the presence of heavy metals. They will screen for a wide range of metals without a placebo just so we see the result. One vaccine will be a mercury-containing vial – the other will be a supposedly mercury-free shot.

 

Once we have the results back from this preliminary test, we will design a true scientific double-blind control study with a view to submitting the results for publication.

 

We will need a lot of help with the designing of this study. It is something that I don’t have experience with and I would dearly love this to be above question and good enough to submit for publication to a peer-reviewed journal.

 

If you have a scientific background and have experience in designing studies, please contact me as I would love to have your help.

 

Sydney Vaccination Seminar – 99% confirmed!

Return to top

 

The seminar we announced 2 weeks ago has now been confirmed – the venue is the only possible sticking point but we are 99% sure that we will be holding this at the following venue:

Manly-Warringah
Rugby League Club Limited

A.C.N. 000 193 251
563  Pittwater Road

Brookvale   NSW   2100
Australia

We just need to be able to confirm that the room we want will be available and we will have confirmation of that tomorrow. If there are any changes, I will be sure and let you know. I just didn’t want to let my second newsletter be late! This seminar is being hosted by both the AVN and the Aurum Project.

 

The speakers will be as follows:

 

Meryl Dorey (that’s me J) from the Australian Vaccination network – talking about some of the most important issues parents face when deciding about vaccination as well as why health professionals need to be well-informed about this subject and how they can help their clients make a balanced decision. I will be discussing the fact that there are many new vaccines on the horizon and their effect on the health of our children and ourselves.

 

Dr David Ritchie – Paediatric Registrar from New Zealand and Anthroposophical Medical Doctor. I first heard David speak over 10 years ago and his knowledge of how to treat the whole child is phenomenal! David will be discussing childhood illnesses – why we should not necessarily fear them and how we can help recognise when a child needs treatment and when they just need the love and care of their family.

 

Isaac Golden, Dip Hom, PhD. – Members of the AVN will know Isaac Golden well as both a professional member of our organisation  and the author of many of the books we carry on homoeopathy. Isaac has researched the issue of homoeoprophylaxis (the use of homoeopathic remedies to prevent infectious diseases) for many years and has published studies indicating that these same remedies are at least as effective as the stated effectiveness of their medical counterparts without the same risk of side effects and ongoing illness.

 

The details for this seminar are as follows:

 

Date – Tuesday – August 15th

 

Time – 6:30pm for a 7:00 SHARP start

 

Venue – Manly Wahringa Leagues club – details above

 

Cost –   AVN members and students (must show student card) - $17 per person/$30 a couple.

 

Non-Members - $27 per person/$42 a couple

 

Bookings will be taken starting now – seating is very limited so avoid disappointment and please pre-book and pay. You can book by calling our office during business hours.

 

For those of you who offered to help on the night, we will be contacting you shortly to confirm your availability.

 

For those who said they would be willing to distribute flyers, we will be getting them off to you ASAP – probably by early next week.

 

If anyone can help and has not yet contacted us, please do so as soon as possible on 02 6687 1699 – ask for either Greta, Judy or Meryl.

 

AVN Membership Drive

Return to top

 

I was contacted after the last newsletter by a non-member who has been subscribed to our email list for some time but was not aware that she could even be a member. She had some fantastic recommendations for ways in which we can increase our membership (and therefore the number of people who know about our information). We have decided to implement one of these straight away and hope that you will throw your support behind this initiative since not only will it help us, but you can benefit as well!

 

It is actually quite simple – we started out complex but have honed the process down to a hopefully easy process.

 

Everyone who is an AVN member has a unique membership ID number. We will provide all members with membership forms (there is one attached to this newsletter – it requires the free Adobe Acrobat reader for you to open this. This can be downloaded at www.adobe.com). On this form, there is a place for you to insert your member ID (if you don’t know your ID, it is on the cover sheet of the magazine or just email gtouzel@avn.org.au and she will email you your ID number). Give this form out to friends, relatives, practitioners, leave them at your preschool or childcare centre – anywhere you think that people will be interested in learning about the information we offer.

For every person who joins on the form with your number on it, you will be credited one point. You will be credited with 2 points for each professional member who signs up on your form. Each point is worth $5 and can be redeemed for either your own membership, a gift subscription, or any of the resources we sell such as books, videos, CDs, DVDs and Information packs.

Here is a way for you to get a free subscription or those books you have always wanted but couldn’t afford. In addition, you will be helping others to get the facts about vaccination and natural health.

Please give this effort your best shot. An informed public is just a few memberships away!

 

The more vaccines, the better

Return to top

 

I did an interview with Howard Sattler on radio 6PR’s drive programme (WA) on Tuesday June 13th for about 15 minutes in total. The interview was driven by an article in the West Australian newspaper on the same day called Multi-dose children’s vaccines safe: doctor.

There is no evidence that combined childhood immunisations, including the MMR vaccine, cause a so-called cocktail effect or are more dangerous than separate injections, a Perth expert says.

Peter Richmond, from the vaccine trials group at the Telethon Institute for Child Health Research and Princess Margaret Hospital, said parents regularly worried about overloading their children’s immune systems but there was no scientific basis for their concerns.

He said research showed that combination vaccines were as safe as any others and that in some cases they produced a better response in terms of antibody levels.

Perth doctors hoped to publish soon the results of a study on MMR – which protects against measles, mumps and rubella – to strengthen the case against the vaccine overload theory.

MMR has been a controversial issue since researcher Andrew Wakefield claimed in 1989 that it caused autism.

Although his research has since been discredited, health officials, particularly in Britain, have had a continuing battle to restore public confidence in the vaccine.

Dr Richmond said Perth researchers were part of an Australian trial to look at the effectiveness of combining two vaccines for menintitis – Haemophilus influenza tupe B (Hib) and meningococcal C – which were currently given separately to babies at 12 months of age.

The vaccine, HibMenC, is licensed and already used in Britain.

Dr Richmond said reducing the number of injections was likely to make it easier for parents to ensure their children completed the necessary course of vaccines and also meant less discomfort for babies because there were fewer places to become sore.

“These vaccines are now given separately to babies and provide excellent protection against what can be a deadly disease,” he said.

“However, we do understand that many parents are concerned by the number of injections given to young children, so where possible it would be great to be able to combine some of these vaccines.”

The meningitis study needs 100 healthy toddlers aged 12-18 months who have not had their booster vaccinations. Interested parents can contact the trials group on 08 9340 8542.

 

In the interview, Howard Sattler started off speaking with Dr Richmond and asked his audience, “Would you have your child vaccinated?” He said that there was concern about the combined MMR jab and spoke about Wakefield and his study – of course, only the 1998 one.

Then, Richmond started in. He said that the original Wakefield study had postulated that there might be a link between the MMR vaccine and autism but that it was a really small study and that ever study published since failed to find any link. He said that Wakefield was misguided and had been totally discredited since his original study was published.

Sattler asked if the vaccine could be linked to bowel conditions and Richmond said absolutely not.

Richmond then went on to talk about the UK and said that because of Wakefield, there was a huge decline in the uptake of MMR vaccine and there had been big measles outbreaks and children had died from measles.

 

It was then my turn and Sattler asked me what I thought about what Richmond had said. I said that Wakefield’s initial study was published in 1998 and that since then, his results had been verified by independent laboratories in Japan, Scotland, Ireland, the US and Russia. I also said that a new study was being conducted in NY which showed that 85% of the children who had been studied so far with regressive autism and bowel conditions were found to have the measles vaccine virus in their gut.

 

I also said that I had recently returned from the Mindd Forum in Sydney and that top experts from all around the world had presented there and every single one of them, without exception, said that they believed that vaccination was a cause of autism. Maybe not the only cause, but certainly a contributing factor.

 

Sattler went back to Richmond who started talking about how we need to keep the vaccination rate higher than 95% or we would see children getting measles again and dying from it and that doctors don’t even recognise the illness any more because it has become so rare here.

 

Sattler asked if measles was a deadly disease and the doctor said absolutely, it was a killer.

 

Sattler returned to me and asked what I thought of that and I said that prior to vaccination, measles mumps and rubella were all considered to be benign diseases of childhood. In fact, I said that we had a quote from a British medical encyclopaedia from 1986 prior to the introduction of the MMR vaccine which stated that, “The only long-term side effects to infection with measles virus was life-long immunity to measles infection.”

 

I also said that the majority of those in Australia who got these diseases, according to the government’s own  statistics, were fully and appropriately vaccinated against them. And that figures were just released in the UK today showing that since 1996, despite (or because of?) the decline in vaccination, both rubella and measles had declined exponentially and though there had been a significant increase in mumps, there were no deaths associated with it.

 

I also said that when trying to judge the safety of vaccines, the basic science has not yet been done because there have never been any double-blind placebo controlled studies performed – the placebo is always either another vaccine or a vaccine adjuvant or solvent.

 

Sattler went back to Richmond who said that he knew of a couple of double blind studies done on vaccines and that we had enough information from the Danish study of a few years ago to show that the MMR vaccine, tested on 500,000 children in this study, was safe and didn’t cause autism.

 

I then asked him to give me some references for studies that used a true placebo because in 17 years of researching this issue, I had not been able to find even one. He could not provide a reference.

 

We then had just one line for closing remarks and Richmond solicited parents to bring their children in for the study on the new combo vaccine.

 

My closing remark was a question to Richmond. I asked him who was funding this study through the Telethon Institute.

 

He answered that it was the vaccine manufacturer who was funding which was absolutely as it should be because after all, it was up to them to prove that the vaccine was safe and effective.

 

All in all, it was a good interview and I think I hopefully got a message out even to the most ovine of listeners that they should be asking some questions.

 

The next day, I called the West Australian and spoke with the reporter who had written the original article. She seemed to feel that she had shown both sides of the story because she mentioned some parents’ fear of the ‘cocktail effect’ of vaccination! We spoke for about 15 minutes and I sent her some information, but I fear that there will not be any follow up on this particular story at least.

 

Wakefield made a scapegoat yet again!

Return to top

 

Dr Andrew Wakefield, the courageous gastroenterologist who first published about the association between the MMR vaccine and gut problems/autism has been through the wringer because of his refusal to deny the findings of his ongoing research. Finding which have been verified by independent laboratories in the US, Ireland, Japan and Russia.

First, he lost his job at the Royal Free Hospital in London and had to move his entire family to the US just to get another position where he could continue his important work.

Now, it seems that the mainstream medical community in the UK is not satisfied with just ruining this man’s career and possibly his life. They are now trying to strike his license to practise medicine – a move which will effectively stop him from working with the families who have come to depend on his very successful treatments to help their autistic children. The following information was forwarded to me by one of our readers:

 

Evil Empire Seeks to Punish Autism Expert

Noted British gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield is certainly no stranger to controversy, terminated from positions in the medical bureaucracy, thanks to his persistence about the undeniable link between vaccines laced with mercury and autism.

Now, the General Medical Council (GMC) -- the UK equivalent of the American Medical Association -- plans to charge Dr. Wakefield on four counts, including serious professional misconduct for "scaring" patients away needlessly from the measles-mumps-rubella (MMR) vaccine, thanks largely to a 1998 paper published in the Lancet.

Formal charges are expected to be presented this fall, with a public hearing slated for next year. Should Dr. Wakefield be found guilty, his license to practice medicine in the UK will likely be revoked. Sadly, few will appreciate how many children his courageous research may have saved in the UK and America.

How much more evidence does anyone need about the dangers of vaccines than the stories I posted last year about the scarcity of autism among Amish children? And what about the most recent study about the measles vaccine being linked to children with regressive autism and serious digestive problems?

Perhaps, it's those arrogant "experts" at the GMC who should be facing charges, and not Dr. Wakefield...

BBC News June 12, 2006

 

BBC NEWS

MMR doctor 'to face GMC charges'

The doctor who first suggested a link between the MMR vaccine and autism is to be charged with serious professional misconduct, it is reported.

The Independent newspaper reports that the General Medical Council will accuse Mr Andrew Wakefield of carrying out "inadequately founded" research.

Vaccination rates fell sharply after Dr Wakefield questioned the safety of MMR, raising fears of a measles epidemic.

His initial Lancet paper has since been disowned by the journal.

The editor admitted he would not have published the 1998 paper if he had known about what he called a "fatal conflict of interest".

Mr Wakefield was being paid to see if there was any evidence to support possible legal action by a group of parents who claimed their children were damaged by the vaccine. Some children were involved in both studies.

In addition ten doctors who co-authored the paper issued a statement in 2004 arguing there was insufficient evidence to draw the conclusion that the MMR vaccine was not safe.

The main thrust of the paper was that MMR was linked not only to autism, but also to the bowel disorder Crohn's disease. Small-scale US research has subsequently produced similar findings.

No corroboration

But a host of major studies has since failed to find any evidence of a link between MMR and autism.

However, the uptake rate for MMR - a triple jab which protects against measles, mumps and rubella - slumped in the wake of the controversy.

The rate has since picked up again, but remains low in some areas of the country, most notably London.

The number of confirmed measles cases in England and Wales rose from 56 in 1998 to 438 in 2003, although the provisional figure for 2005 was back down to 77.

The Independent reports that Mr Wakefield will face four charges: that he published inadequately founded research, failed to obtain ethical committee approval for the work, obtained funding for it improperly, and subjected children to "unnecessary and invasive investigations".

The paper says that detailed charges are being formulated by the GMC's lawyers, and will be presented in the autumn, with a public hearing expected next year.

If found guilty, Mr Wakefield could be struck off the medical register.

Mr Wakefield carried out his initial study while working at London's Royal Free Hospital.

He has since moved to the US.

A General Medical Council spokesperson refused to confirm details, but said: "An investigation is ongoing."

She said the council had been investigating Mr Wakefield since The Lancet issued its retraction in 2004.

She added that any charges against him might "evolve" before they were formally presented.

Story from BBC NEWS:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/go/pr/fr/-/1/hi/health/5070670.stm

 

 

So what did happen after Wakefield’s article was published?

Return to top

 

According to health ‘experts’ around the world, after Wakefield’s initial article on the link between MMR vaccination and autism was published and the ensuing furore with the efforts to sue the British government for vaccine injuries, the number of children getting the MMR shot dropped, there were huge epidemics of all three of these diseases and  children were hospitalised and died.

 

I haven’t got the UK statistics to hand, but here are the figures from the Welsh government. Remember that this article was published in 1998.

 

How cases of measles, mumps and rubella in Wales have fluctuated with MMR
take-up

MMR UPTAKE
2005 - 85%
2003-04 - 80%
1996-97 - 91% (before Dr Andrew Wakefield's claims jab is linked to autism
and bowel disease)

MUMPS
2005 - 3,757 cases
2004 - 1,891 cases
1995 - 71 cases

MEASLES
2005 - no cases
2004 - four cases
1996 - no cases

RUBELLA
2005 - two cases
2004 - no cases
1996 - 347 cases

(Source: Health Protection Agency)

 

Interestingly, whilst mumps seems to have increased (and mumps is just about as likely to be mis-diagnosed as measles, according to the Pulse article quoted in the last edition of this newsletter), measles saw no increase at all and the rate of Rubella diagnoses actually declined!

 

Measles Vaccine Undeniably Linked to Autism

 

Return to top

The vaccine strain of measles virus has been found in the guts of 85 percent of autistic children in a New York University School of Medicine study.

The finding renews concerns that the triple combination vaccine of measles, mumps and rubella (MMR) given to children may not be entirely safe.

In the study, biopsies of gut tissue were performed on 82 autistic children who had serious intestinal inflammation. Seventy of these showed evidence of the measles virus.

Similar results were found by Dr. Andrew Wakefield, who found the measles virus in the guts of 12 autistic children in 1998, and pathologist John O'Leary in 2002.

In the UK, over 2,000 parents say their children were developing normally until they received the MMR vaccine when they were 12-18 months old. Afterward, the children developed autism. Some theorize that the virus may pass through the gut and into the bloodstream, from which it is able to attack the brain.

Mainstream scientists maintain that there is no evidence linking the MMR vaccine to autism, however, in the UK concerns regarding MMR's potential side effects have driven vaccination rates to as low as 70 percent.

 

http://www.mercola.com/display/router.aspx?docid=33228

 

More on the QCCL

Return to top

 

In the last edition of Doing the Rounds, we talked about Terry O’Gorman’s discriminatory views on a parent’s right to choose not to vaccinate and how he felt that vaccinations should be compulsory. One of our sleuthing members has found out some more information on the organisation Mr O’Gorman represents:

 

Hi Meryl

 

Thanks for your Email Newsletter and the information on Terry O'Gorman's view. Being Queenslanders we hear his point of view regularly and they are not always sound.

 

However, we investigated the website for QCCL and did a search on 'vaccination' and found this information in what appears to be their 1996/97 annual report:

 

(see pg 9 of the above link)

 

"VACCINATIONS

This represented a classic balancing of civil liberties issues between the rights of the community (where there is clear evidence that an inadequate level of vaccination in the community as a whole places children at risk of death and serious injury as a result of preventable diseases) against the strongly held and genuine beliefs of a small but vocal minority who are opposed to compulsory vaccination.

The Council for Civil Liberties believes that any legislation governing vaccinations, however framed, must continue to recognise the rights of community members conscientiously opposed to vaccination." (emphasis added)

 Given that this is the view of the organisation he represents, why is he publicly espousing an opposing view? It would appear to be his personal viewpoint rather than the view of the Council of Civil Liberties.

I will be writing to him to seek clarification on that above in relation to the Tasmanian measles article and to find out why they are not "recognis(ing) the rights of community members (who are) concientiously opposed to vaccination". I will let you know if I get a response.

 Thanks sincerely for all your hard work

AVN Members

Perhaps others would like to write to the QCCL and ask the same question? Please submit their replies to me on meryl@avn.org.au – we’ll meet back and compare notes on what they say.

This courtesy archive provided by Herb Allure (herballure.com)