1 registered members (Russ),
740
guests, and 15
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Only The Best Herbs!
Your best source of world-class herbal information! More... |
#1 Book We've Found!
"Silver" fillings, mercury detox, & much more. More... |
For Mercury Detox
Prevent mercury reabsorption in the colon during detox. More... |
Softcover & Kindle
Excellent resource for mercury detox. More... |
For Mercury Chelation
For calcium chelation and heart health. More... |
Must for Every Parent
The most complete vaccine info on the planet. More... |
Finally.
Relief! More... |
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Get the info you need to protect yourself. More... |
What everyone's talking about!
Safe, powerful, timely! More... |
There is a difference!
A powerful brain antioxidant for use during Hg detox. More... |
This changed my life!
This book convinced me remove my fillings. More... |
This is what we use!
The only multi where you feel the difference. More... |
Hair Tests Explained!
Discover hidden toxicities, easily. More... |
Have Racing Thoughts?
Many use GABA for anxiety and better sleep. More... |
Help Them!
Natural health for pets. More... |
The Bible We Use!
King James with study notes by Bullinger. More... |
The Bible We Use!
King James with study notes by Bullinger. More... |
Food Additives
Protect your family from toxic food! More... |
|
|
|
|
Re: Hardly worth the effort
[Re: Bex]
#44683
11/04/08 05:30 PM
11/04/08 05:30 PM
|
|
If the quibble here is what I've said about the bannings then I know what's been officially said about them here and we'll have to agree to disagree. Just please remember that a difference of opinion is not necessarily the same as someone mocking or being dishonest or slanderous. It's a difference of opinion. Where factual information is in question, such as the definition of the theory of evolution, then clarifying the facts is not mocking or dishonest or slanderous either.
I will make an effort to be more polite to CTD. Being on his "side," as you put it, I don't suppose you see what it is like to try to debate with someone who often does not make it clear what they are actually saying, who rarely substantiates claims with evidence, who regularly uses distraction tactics and ad hominem in order to avoid talking about science. It's hard to write with respect to someone who writes to me in that style but in your eyes I'm sure it's simply deserved because you clearly think I'm "just as bad." I could give you specific examples but I think you'd simply tell me I was getting as good as I was giving. You are biased Bex, and I don't think you understand where those who disagree with you are coming from. This is not a criticism but an observation. Now CTD can fend for himself here. If you don't like something I've said to you, then please point it out specifically and we can talk about it.
|
|
|
|