?in conclusion, we consider that dental amalgam, from the strictly toxicological point of view, is an unsuitable dental filling material. It is our opinion that, in the future, steps should be taken to use, as far as possible, other material than amalgam. ... In the interim, we find it highly appropriate to classify the mercury used dentistry as a Class III device.?

Dr. Lars Friberg, MD, PhD
Former head of toxicology at WHO (World Health Organization)
Quote from FDA/PHS (public health service) meeting


?Why is the ADA so confident that amalgam is safe? The strongest and most convincing support we have for the safety of dental amalgam is the fact that each year more than 100 million amalgams are placed in the U.S.?

The Journal of the American Dental Association (JADA)
April 1990 Issue


?Faced with growing public concern, the National Institute of Dental Research (division of the NIH) is reluctantly discussing a large-scale investigation for looking for a link between dental amalgam and assorted health problems.?

Consumer Report (An ADA Journal)
Published 1991


The above taken from Dr. Huggins newsletter.


"With reference to the fact that mercury is a multipotent toxin with effects on several levels of the biochemical dynamics of the cell, amalgam must be considered to be an unsuitable material for dental restoration. This is especially true since fully adequate and less toxic alternatives are available."

Swedish Government Report of 2003

The Captian
Today they call you "crazy". Tomorrow they call you "ahead of your time."
Global Skywatch Learn about Chemtrails - You're breathing them now!
OnlyTheBestHerbs.com World-class supplements
Mercury Talk Why you are sick.
OneUp Domains Domains, Hosting, Email
1-800-358-4278 (U.S. & Canada)