News you won't see in controlled mainstream media.

According to an article in the "Journal of Obstetric, Gynecologic, and Neonatal Nursing" (2002, 31(6):715-720)



In fact, as far back as 1985, there was published information about the dangers of methylmercury. I've included an article below from the journal, "Environmental Health Perspectives" (1985, 63:133-140):


<img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/mad.gif" alt="" />There is NO EXCUSE for pharmaceutical companies and dentists to be using Mercury in vaccinations or in dental filling material. Obviously, the scientific studies have already been conducted on both humans and primates! The results are in...mercury is toxic!

I want to know:

Why has it taken 20 years for this information to only begin to start being dispersed to the general public?

Why do doctors and dentists still continue to argue with us about the dangers of mercury?

Why is mercury (thimerosal) STILL being used in vaccines, either as a preservative or as an ingredient in the vaccine development process (which leaves trace amounts of mercury in the final solution)?

How much higher are the miscarriage, infant death, learning disorder, and autism rates going to climb in the U.S. before people take action?

When are Americans going to DEMAND that mercury be outlawed for use in vaccines and dental fillings?

I also marvel at why mercury is permitted to be injected in people's bloodstreams. They know mercury is in thimerasol. Even if they cant accept that the hardened mercury in metal fillings is dangerous, surely, you would think they would acknowledge that methyl mercury injected in our very own bloodstream-- (which remains in the body and builds up with each vaccination or flu shot) is dangerous. I mean- jeeeeez, it is in liquid form-- and they argue that only that type of mercury is dangerous! (We know that's not true- but this is the ADA's argument)

The hypocrisy in this only enforces my feelings that they want to "dumb down" society and keep the general population from getting too healthy.

God forbid there is a mandatory flu vaccine with this blown out of proportion Avian Flu.

I worry if Hilary Clinton does run for office in 2008. She has big plans for a universal health care system and enforced vaccines in times of pandemics. This even appeals to many Republicans in Congress- - so expect her to get her way if she becomes president,--- God help America as more of our rights become stripped from us if God doesnt intervene.

I wrote to two State senators and gave them a piece of my mind regardng that enforced vaccination bill they will get passed by the end of the year. We all should make pains of ourselves and make our opinions heard.

Even if they scoff at our letters and do what they want anyway-- at least they can't justify their evil by saying they had no backlash.

It does not look very good, does it - war in Iraq, possibility of mandatory vaccination of EVERYBODY (no exemptions), Hilary for prez., millions of illegal immigrants, etc. I am not religious, yet I agree with you that the only thing that will clean up the mess is the direct intervention of God Himself.

I actually live in Ny and people here don't really like her or her ideas. So let's hope she doesn't get that far.
And if mandatory vaccines pass, I am sorry but I will be relocating to some religious sect somewhere or another country. Might as well legalize street drugs and let us kill ourselves quicker. If we could just get corporate drug company out of Mr. Government's pocket.

Better not join any self-contained religious sects - remember Waco?

I don't even live in the USA, but I don't know who would be worse for president - Hilary C. or a Bush-alike...tweedledum and tweedledee, I guess.

They are both boobs! Pardon the saying. I can say that half of what our pres says makes no sense. Just so you know...there are a lot of us Americans that do not agree or condone his actions. And I doubt they will let a chic be Pres here either. They pretend we are the same as men in rights and treatment, but I don't see it.