1 registered members (Russ),
1,255
guests, and 30
spiders. |
Key:
Admin,
Global Mod,
Mod
|
|
S |
M |
T |
W |
T |
F |
S |
|
|
|
1
|
2
|
3
|
4
|
5
|
6
|
7
|
8
|
9
|
10
|
11
|
12
|
13
|
14
|
15
|
16
|
17
|
18
|
19
|
20
|
21
|
22
|
23
|
24
|
25
|
26
|
27
|
28
|
29
|
30
|
31
|
|
|
Only The Best Herbs!
Your best source of world-class herbal information! More... |
#1 Book We've Found!
"Silver" fillings, mercury detox, & much more. More... |
For Mercury Detox
Prevent mercury reabsorption in the colon during detox. More... |
Softcover & Kindle
Excellent resource for mercury detox. More... |
For Mercury Chelation
For calcium chelation and heart health. More... |
Must for Every Parent
The most complete vaccine info on the planet. More... |
Finally.
Relief! More... |
Dr. Sherri Tenpenny
Get the info you need to protect yourself. More... |
What everyone's talking about!
Safe, powerful, timely! More... |
There is a difference!
A powerful brain antioxidant for use during Hg detox. More... |
This changed my life!
This book convinced me remove my fillings. More... |
This is what we use!
The only multi where you feel the difference. More... |
Hair Tests Explained!
Discover hidden toxicities, easily. More... |
Have Racing Thoughts?
Many use GABA for anxiety and better sleep. More... |
Help Them!
Natural health for pets. More... |
The Bible We Use!
King James with study notes by Bullinger. More... |
The Bible We Use!
King James with study notes by Bullinger. More... |
Food Additives
Protect your family from toxic food! More... |
|
|
|
|
Re: An Analysis of the Federal Government’s Pertussis Immunisation Policy
[Re: Russ]
#61506
02/17/11 12:00 AM
02/17/11 12:00 AM
|
Master Elite Member
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,707
|
|
They are at it Again, Thanks Russ, ((((( Smiles )))) That is interesting for sure. Silencing the dissenters interesting article too! http://www.archetypeltd.co.nz/Silencing_dissenters.htm Plus what they are injecting into us and our children is a terrible thing and I believe the chemicals/additives, heavy metals, and immune-modulating properties of vaccines may cause further neurological, inflammatory, or autoimmune changes expecially with a child or adult already effected prone to that expecially with autism as some people are more prone to the risks then other's may be and may we never forget about Hannah Poling and all the other possible Hanning Polings out there.. And their seems to be a vaccine-susceptible subset of the population and nobody is testing for that and plus autism is a spectrum of symptoms and that could bypass just a Hanning poling one subset and go on to another vunerable subset so how do they test for this thats if they were testing at all, that is. Or what if certain people a subset may be more suceptable then others and a standard test would not tell us for sure who could suffer a vaccine injury over another. Plus of course it could also depend on the higher risk of... how many vaccines taken, amount of additives, age, weight, height, etc on and on. Plus...... Trust me it's safe doesn't fly with alot of people any more as they don't have to live and care for a disabled child as we suffer they don't. So all the risk is on us not them. And of course what about the infant monkeys vaccination study that says it all for me. THANK GOD for the Doctors and people that do speak out about it as it's not easy/popular to do so... but who wants to see anybody especially children at risk for possible neurological or inflammatory harm? Now that would be evil wouldn't it too not speak up about that possibilty. They have already lost trust with many people in the world over this issue. Plus injecting all that stuff into people/children that is in a vaccines is an Un- Godly practice lots of people are shocked and feel deceived about what they do. And probably alot of people in the medical community are torn about it their job and what they know about it. Maybe alot of them feel deceived and used as well.
|
|
|
Re: An Analysis of the Federal Government’s Pertussis Immunisation Policy
[Re: Lynnmn]
#61604
02/23/11 05:58 PM
02/23/11 05:58 PM
|
Master Elite Member
|
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 4,707
|
|
And it gets even worse as PREVENTION is worth A POUND of solution it seems. I don't think it's worth the risk and lots more people in the world are feeling that way as well that things in this world are NOT what they thought they were and you lose that trust. What did the pink disease children ever really get anyway and how long did that take to get any validation??? Things don't seem to really change much do they, buyer beware. >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Supreme Court Ruling Abandons Vaccine-Injured Children, Threatens Vaccine Safety Decision in Bruesewitz case leaves families with no hope of obtaining compensation from drug makers for vaccine injuries Nixa, MO – The National Autism Association (NAA) joins parents nationwide in calling yesterday’s Supreme Court decision in the Bruesewitz case a violation of civil rights. The outcome also removes any remaining incentive for vaccine manufacturers to make their products as safe as possible. The Bruesewitz family sought compensation fortheir daughter Hannah who developed a lifelong seizure disorder following a DTP vaccine she received as an infant in 1992. The vaccine was manufactured by Lederle, now owned by Wyeth. The Bruesewitz family had initially filed a complaint in the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program as required by law, but the claim was denied following years of litigation. The family has now been told by the Supreme Court that they do not have the right to sue the vaccine manufacturer to receive justice or compensation for the health care and services Hannah will need for the rest of her life. “This ruling is a crushing blow not only to families struggling to provide care for their vaccine-injured children, but also to the rights of every US citizen,” said parent and NAA board chair Lori McIlwain. “No other industry enjoys such complete protection from liability for harm caused to people injured by their products.” The right to sue drug companies directly for injuries caused by vaccines was first hindered in1986 when the National Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (NVICP) took effect for children born after October 1988. This program was originally designed to provide quick, non-adversarial compensation for care to those suffering injuries from mandated vaccines, while giving claimants the opportunity to opt out into civil court. Yes, the program hassince only served to provide unprecedented protection to vaccine makers. Unencumbered by litigation, drug companies now had practically unfettered influence upon government vaccine program decision-makers, ensuring their vaccines were given to every child in America. Through the years, problems with the NVICP became apparent with many critics now believing it is a completely broken system that allows no discovery phase and evidence pertinent to cases is made inaccessible. Petitioners were required to file first through the NVICP before seeking compensation directly from drug companies for vaccine injuries. Yesterday’s decision has taken away the second option altogether, giving complete immunity to the entire vaccine industry. “For years now, vaccine makers have had very little incentive to ensure their products were as safe as possible,” said Ms. McIlwain. “With yesterday’s decision, the Supreme Court has rendered vaccine makers completely untouchable: they will not be held accountable for debilitating injury and death from use of their vaccines. If poorly-made tires cause injuries and deaths to consumers, victims have a right to obtain compensation from the manufacturer. But there are no consequences for drug companies, no matter how unsafe their vaccines are or how many injuries and deaths they cause.” While thousands of families are expressing outrage at the federal government’s broken promise of medical care following a vaccine injury, many believe that the Supreme Court decision will actually hurt the vaccine program in the long run. “Americans now know that if they become injured by a vaccine, they are completely on their own with no way to receive compensation for care from vaccine makers,” said Ms. McIlwain. NAA joins advocacy organizations throughout the country in asking Congress for investigation and action to amend the 1986 National Childhood Vaccine Injury Act to keep its original promise: that federal Vaccine Court was an additional non-adversarial, generous, and effective no-fault remedy--and not a substitute for traditional tort remedies--and to restore the fundamental civil right under American law for petitioners to sue industry in civil court if dissatisfied by the actions of the Vaccine Court. For more information, please visit www.nationalautism.org and www.coalitionforvaccinesafety.org-30- Think Autism. Think Cure. ®
|
|
|
|