Quote
Quote
I hope LindaLou & Linear will pick up on this

What I've "picked up on" from your conversation here with RAZD is that you know little about what you're criticising, which is a comment I've made to you and others here before.
Is that so? I think I have a pretty good idea what I'm talking about, and so does everyone here, including you.

Bex posted some information & RAZD chose to attack Harun Yayah by slandering him. Can't really believe you missed it.

Quote
You refuse to engage with the information which has been presented and are re-iterating comments you made previously which have clearly been proved to be erroneous (i.e. what is meant in PE terms by "large" mutations). Your most recent post about this is nothing but more raving because you seem to want to have the last word.
I directly engaged the slanderous statement & all subsequent attempts to alter it or otherwise obfuscate the issues. Rather than being man enough to retract the lie, RAZD has chosen to mount an incompetent campaign of disinformation.

You even try to repeat the obfuscation. But I don't think you want anyone to get it right. RAZD talks of "large" mutations as if they were "large" evolution & then says HY wouldn't call this "large" evolution. My guess is that HY would call a large mutation a large mutation & your evopastor has presented no evidence to back up his improbable assertion.

Even if it were true, (best case for you two) that HY wouldn't call a macromutation a macromutation, RAZD's actual accusation would still be false! You'd like folks to forget that, but I'd like for both of you to demonstrate just how arrogant you really are. To that end, I have so far continued to post.

You don't really clarify what you're posting about. You talk of PE & you talk of my last post which is about RAZD's other false statement: that Russ, myself, & who knows how many other creationists use straw men and/or don't know "what evolution is." From one who's on a never-ending quest to redefine the term...

I was thinking of dropping it, but RAZD keeps on & on about it, even in posts about his HY slander. And he has yet to answer his own question. Perhaps you'd like to pitch in and take a stab at it?

In the context which it originally occurred, one easily gets the impression RAZD actually does know the answer. Maybe he's too proud to admit that he doesn't. If you could provide the answer, it might relieve a lot of strain on the poor fellow.

But I don't expect you want to show him up, eh? Maybe PM the answer to him, so nobody knows where he got it.

Until then, I think the real question is how much longer we will see:
Evolutionism: Babble slaves! <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smiliewhipit.gif" alt="" />
<img src="http://razd.evcforum.net/Pictures/CvE/RAZD.gif">: <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smilieworship.gif" alt="" />
<img src="http://herballure.com/ubbthreads/uploads/1189.jpg">: <img src="/ubbthreads/images/graemlins/smilieworship.gif" alt="" />

Dark Matter + Dark Energy = Dark Truth

"We find that such evidence demonstrates that the ID argument is dependent upon setting a scientifically unreasonable burden of proof for the theory of evolution." - Judge Jones Kitzmiller case
http://www.talkreason.org/articles/Falsify.cfm

"To Compel A Man To Furnish Funds For The Propagation Of Ideas He Disbelieves And Abhors Is Sinful And Tyrannical." - Thomas Jefferson

"And can the liberties of a nation be thought secure when we have removed their only firm basis, a conviction in the minds of the people that these liberties are the gift of God? That they are not to be violated but with his wrath?" - Thomas Jefferson