News you won't see in controlled mainstream media.

OK, good. Some actual conversation.

So, how do we arrive at those numbers? You said...



OK, so how reliable are these forms of dating?

I know that you must know that this is a very good question because there is a ton of evidence out there that radiometric dating is faulty. There is also a solid argument (superior in my opinion) that fossil dating is based on circular reasoning propelled by an agenda (like much junk science).

My point in asking this is clear: I have found that when you walk down any path of reasoning that claims to support evolution (and I have), you find discrepancies and junk science by the boatloads. It's very much like mercury-safety science or global warming. Anyone who looks closely enough finds a clear pattern of agenda setting.

So, go ahead and tell me. How reliable?